OpenAI vs n8n
- Avi Giri
- Oct 14
- 2 min read
'𝐎𝐩𝐞𝐧𝐀𝐈 𝐣𝐮𝐬𝐭 𝐤𝐢𝐥𝐥𝐞𝐝 𝐧𝟖𝐧/𝐙𝐚𝐩𝐢𝐞𝐫'
Well, not really. The truth is less dramatic, and opens up a different conversation.
Like most of LinkedIn and X (or Twitter, sorry Elon :P), I too followed OpenAI's Dev Day, and just as the rumours have stated, they've released a new tool called Agent Builder, which promises users the ability to build agents and workflows using a visual drag and drop editor. Sounds familiar? Well that's because it is!
Agent Builder is in no way a first mover in the field of workflow automations. As things currently stand, alternative platforms like n8n and Zapier are much more feature dense, have more matured products and most importantly are production ready.
As a late mover in this domain however, there are 2 distinct paths that OpenAI could take here to either capture and dominate the existing market, or open the doors to a previously untapped segment of it:
1) 𝐒𝐮𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐢𝐧𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐩𝐚𝐭𝐡: Develop their product as a sustaining technology, constantly enhance the capabilities and features available in Agent Builder until it achieves parity with the competition, then utilise OpenAI's sea of resources to further build a moat around leveraging their proprietary AI and networking effects to create a sticky ecosystem for users, essentially boxing out the competition inch by inch over time.
2) 𝐃𝐢𝐬𝐫𝐮𝐩𝐭𝐢𝐯𝐞 𝐩𝐚𝐭𝐡: Instead of building another drag-and-drop visual editor, reimagine Agent Builder by making the interface entirely chat/text driven, where users simply describe in natural language the workflow or agent they want and it is instantly generated, editable, and runnable (Something like what Lindy already does, but make it better).
This radically lowers the barrier to entry, bringing an influx of non-technical users who find node-based editors too complex to use, while still providing flexibility for refinement.
By reframing automation as a conversation rather than a complicated window of nodes, OpenAI can tap into a broader, previously ignored market and over time shift the expectation of how workflows are built, leaving traditional builder-based platforms looking complex and outdated, and truly bringing the power of automation into every user's hands.
In my opinion, the greater opportunity for OpenAI lies less in catching up with today’s leaders, and more in evolving the automation market toward a new paradigm altogether. What do you think?



Comments